Most B2B SaaS company podcasts get canceled inside 14 months. The reasons are predictable: the host loses interest, the production overhead is higher than expected, the audience numbers are small, and the executive sponsor stops championing the investment when the next quarterly review comes around.

The three failure patterns I see most

  1. The vanity podcast. Founder thinks they want to be on podcasts. Company starts one to give the founder a recurring slot. There’s no specific audience job to be done — it’s mostly about the founder’s personal brand. These get canceled because the founder’s interest fades when the metrics aren’t validating.
  2. The category-leadership podcast. Goal is to make the company “the voice of [category].” Format is interviews with industry guests. The problem: 200 other companies are doing the same play, the show sounds interchangeable with the others, and the audience never figures out why this one is worth subscribing to.
  3. The marketing-team podcast. Run by the content marketing function, hosted by someone other than the founder, designed to feed the top-of-funnel. These are the most efficient on paper but underperform because the host doesn’t have the in-network authority to book interesting guests.

The one pattern that works

Across the dozen-or-so podcast efforts I’ve watched closely over the past four years, the consistent winners share three properties:

What the metrics actually look like

Realistic expectations for a B2B SaaS podcast targeted at a narrow audience:

The hidden value: guest selection becomes its own GTM tool. Interviewing a senior leader at a target-account company is the warmest possible opening for an enterprise sales conversation 6 months later. Several of the best podcast investments I’ve seen are functionally ABM in long form.

When not to do it

If none of those apply, podcast investments have an outstanding asymmetric upside for content programs that can wait 18 months for the compounding to kick in. If you can sustain that wait.

— Anish